Representative Matters

• Several million-dollar settlements in cases for employees and senior executives in the entertainment and technology industry.
• Successfully represented the former Director of Marketing for the world’s largest forensics company and obtained over $1 million in sanctions for discovery abuse.
• Kardashian Defamation and Copyright Case (Pearson v. Kardashian et al.): Peter represented Ellen Pearson, widow of Robert Kardashian Sr., in defamation claims against the Kardashian family over statements made on their reality show. While diary ownership issues were settled, Pearson’s defamation claims continued confidentially after surviving dismissal efforts.
• California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Pregnancy Discrimination Class Action (CDCR) (Carreon v. CDCR):  Peter served as lead counsel in a class action on behalf of over 1,000 female correctional officers who faced discriminatory treatment while pregnant. A $5.1 million settlement and policy reforms were reached in 2024, marking a major legal and policy victory.
• Transgender Discrimination Case Against Starbucks (Wade v. Starbucks):  Peter represented Maddie Wade, a transgender employee who sued Starbucks for harassment and constructive discharge. Though the case was ultimately dismissed, the appeal drew national attention and widespread support from civil rights groups.
• LAUSD Whistleblower Case:  Peter represented a former LAUSD risk manager who alleged retaliation for exposing legal mishandling in the Miramonte sex abuse scandal. The whistleblower suit garnered media attention.
• L.A. County Probation Officers Class Action (2024): Peter Law Group filed a class action on behalf of deputy probation officers forced into medically unsafe assignments at juvenile halls. The case is pending in Los Angeles Superior Court and may trigger broader litigation on similar issues.
• Ansel Adams “Lost Negatives” Dispute: Peter represented Rick Norsigian in a dispute over negatives believed to be by Ansel Adams, defending their authenticity and commercial use. The case settled, ending a closely watched trademark and First Amendment battle.
• Advised major film entities and represented high-profile clients in entertainment. His practice spans cross-border deals, talent agreements, and labor disputes, with a track record of seven-figure settlements and public impact litigation.

FAQs

Do I have to pay upfront to speak with an attorney?

No. Peter Law Group offers an initial consultation so you can discuss your situation and better understand your legal options before deciding how to proceed.

What is a contingency fee?

Many employment cases are handled on a contingency fee basis. This means you generally do not pay attorney’s fees upfront. Instead, attorney’s fees are paid only if your case results in a recovery. During your consultation, we’ll explain whether your case may qualify and answer any questions about fees.

I’m not sure if I have a case. Should I still contact you?

Yes. Many employees aren’t certain whether their employer’s actions violated California law. A consultation can help you understand your rights, evaluate the facts of your situation, and determine whether you may have a legal claim.

Will my consultation be confidential?

Yes. Everything you share during your consultation is treated confidentially in accordance with applicable ethical and legal obligations. We encourage you to be open about your situation so we can provide the most accurate assessment possible.

What should I bring to my consultation?

If available, it’s helpful to bring documents such as employment agreements, termination notices, pay stubs, emails, text messages, performance reviews, or any other records related to your employment. If you don’t have these documents, you can still contact us to discuss your situation.